From Assange to Fuellmich: same pattern, different accusation?

In this conversation, we touched on an unpleasant but important topic: what happens when someone gets a platform that “bothers” the powerful. We started with Julian Assange — an example that, whether anyone likes it or not, shows a pattern: when someone with reach appears and says things that do not pass through the “approved filters”, the system often does not go to debate with arguments… but to discredit. In the conversation, we compare this pattern with the case of Reiner Fuellmich: not the same story, but a similar logic of pressure — only here, as they say, financial accusation is an easier and more common tool. We also mention the example of Jacques Baud (blocking accounts and “silencing” by the administration method). Then we get to the key: why Fuellmich’s case is politically sensitive and what he did during the pandemic in the first place. According to the interviewee, his role was “threefold”: 1. Platform / Corona Investigative Committee – a place where information was published that was not easy to get elsewhere. 2. Political ambition – in 2021 he is running and is associated with the dieBasis party, which has gained a large number of supporters in a short period of time. 3. Seeking a class action lawsuit – especially regarding the measures and the PCR test, which he considered the basis for “manufacturing figures” and an atmosphere of fear. I am not claiming that all of this is a “proven conspiracy” — but I am claiming something simpler: these are topics that deserve an open discussion, without censorship and without taboos. If you are interested in how cases are built against people who become too influential, this interview will be very interesting for you. 👉 Watch the full interview, and if you want more content like this: subscribe to the channel, turn on the bell and share the video. (The system loves silence — we don’t really.)