Evidence-Based Reasons Against HPV Vaccine Mandates

Donate: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/slobodnipoIn this clip from Slobodni Podcast, Mary Holland lays out her core argument against making HPV vaccination mandatory — and explains what kind of research she believes is missing, why conflicts of interest matter, and where parents can look for primary information. Key points discussed in this segment: Clinical trials vs. real outcomes: the claim that trials relied on surrogate endpoints and did not track cancer as a final outcome Safety claims: the guest alleges severe adverse events, including deaths, and argues this should rule out mandates Adjuvant concern: the guest highlights the presence of an aluminum adjuvant and frames it as a major risk factor “True placebo” demand: an argument that new trials should compare vaccinated groups to a genuinely inert placebo group, not an active control Conflicts of interest: the guest raises concerns about financial incentives and institutional ties Where parents can look: suggested starting points include reading the official product insert (package insert) and reviewing sources the guest recommends, alongside primary studies and regulator assessments ▶️ Full episode link: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJTy3oXCzHShsVuJ-zfiGnx96nuR-BNWB WEB: https://slobodnipodcast.hr/2026/02/08/obvezno-hpv-cjepivo-u-hrvatskoj-pitanja-koja-sluzbena-medicina-izbjegava/ Disclaimer: This clip presents the guest’s claims and interpretation. Viewers should consult primary trial publications, product labeling, regulatory reviews, and independent evidence syntheses when forming conclusions. #HPV #Gardasil #VaccinePolicy #ClinicalEvidence #MedicalEthics